Brown V. Louisiana Essay

During the 1960s, manhoody African-Americans believed that well-mannered sounds should fix a national priority. Young civil rights activists brought their ca habit to the national stage and demanded the national governwork forcet assist them and help recess the issues that plagued them. Many of them ch altogetherenged segregation in the in the south by balking at stores and schools that practiced segregation. nonwithstanding the efforts of these groups and Supreme Court rulings that ordered the desegregation of b consumptions and bus stations, violence and prejudice once morest African-Americans in the South continued Meyer, F.S. , 1968). In the 1960s many things were off limits to African-Americans. They werent venerable as equals and suffered greatly because of it. Theres an unfamiliar slipperiness to most that took vest in atomic number 57 that helped shaped the use of public facilities for all people. This case is cognize as embrown v. atomic number 57. The Audubo n Regional program library in Clinton, Louisiana, Parish of East Feliciana did not execute blacks. shadowys, at that time, were expected to use star of two bookmobiles. The red bookmobile served blanks and the blue bookmobile served blacks.On March 7, 1964, ive schoolgirlish African-American males entered the bighearted reading room and one of the hands, Brown, pass a book called, The Story of the Negro, by Arna Bontemps. The assistant librarian checked the carte catalogue and discovered that the library did not feed the book. She told Brown that she would request it from the body politic library and he could either have it mailed to his home address or he could pick it up from the bookmobile. afterwards the men had been given the news around the book they sat brush up quietly. afterwards the men failed to cede the library, the assistant librarian call for that they go. They did not. Brown sat down while the former(a)s stood surfaceby. The assistant librarian pas t went to the head librarian who requested them to leave as well. Again, they did not. A few moments later, the sheriff arrived and requested that they leave again, and again, they did not. The sheriff arrested them and charged them with the intention to discharge a breach of peace and ruin to leave a public structure when ordered to do so (Coates, R. , 2005). The quintuplet men were tried and found guilty.Brown was sentenced to pay $150 for court be or spend 90 old age in Jail. The four other men were sentenced to $35 for court costs or 15 days in ail. beneath Louisiana law, the convictions werent appealable whence their requests for discretionary reviews were denied. The Supreme Court given writ of certiorari. A certiorari is an extraordinary liberty injunction granted in cases that s foreveral(predicate)ly would not be entitled to review. In writing for the majority, jurist Fortas first examined whether the protesters could be convicted for refusing to leave the libra ry.He think that they could not since their protest was serene and blacks could not be denied access since whites were allowed inside as well. He reviewed the onduct of the men and felt that this had no chastity either. The state argued that the men were proving their intent to confuse the peace and upset the librarian. Justice Fortas concluded that the arrest was a violation of the mens First and Fourteenth Amendment rights that stock warrant freedom of speech and assembly and the right to opposed this opinion and took to issue with the majoritys reasoning.He disagreed that the Constitution prohibits any state from fashioning sit-ins or stand-ups in public libraries illegal. Second, color argued that the previous breach of the peace cases in Louisiana differed from Brown v. Louisiana. Previously in that location had been several other situations where there were peaceful demonstrations over prejudiced practices. Garner v. Louisiana (1961) involved a sit-in at a lunch count er to protest service for whites only. In Taylor v. Louisiana (1962) blacks again protested the presence of bus depot that was for white customers only.In Coxv. Louisiana (1965) a man led a demonstration near the courthouse and Jail to protest the arrest of other demonstrations. Each of the protests, along with Brown v. Louisiana, was all orderly and peaceful and was over discriminatory practices that denied the protesters rights hat were seed to them under the Constitution. Justice Black opposition was joined by collar other Justices. They argued that the First Amendment did not guarantee to any person the right to use someone elses property withal that owned by the government and give to other purposes.On Wednesday, February 23, 1966 the decision was do 5 votes for Brown and 4 against him (Coates, R. , 2005). The young men won The Courts ruling in this case, along with the others, be vital to the cultured Rights struggles and also to the Vietnam warfare protests that would follow. Indeed, without these rulings the 1960s and early 1970s whitethorn have been a completely different period in time, especially when it comes to the Civil Rights movement. In the last line of Justice Blacks opinion in Brown v.Louisiana he wrote The holding in this case today makes it more necessary than ever that we stop and look more close at where we are going (Meyer, F. S. , 1968). In conclusion, had it not been for demonstrations of this kind, and the Supreme Court granting certiorari there is a strong mishap that none of this would have ever taken place. Oftentimes, it is in a ime of pain and hurt that the Just shall prevail, and I believe this is no different.There is more work to do but with the Supreme Court cosmos behind you, at least you hold up its not in vain.